Scannell v. Strahle

9 Cal. 177
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

The findings in this case, which are supported by the evidence, fully sustain the judgment; and wo have often held that we will not disturb the findings of a Court or jury on account of conflicting evidence.

The testimony offered by defendants, to prove ownership in the property, was properly rejected, because entirely inconsistent with the declarations and admissions of defendants, made at the time the plaintiff was induced to permit the property to remain in their possession until called for,

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scannell v. Strahle, 9 Cal. 177 (Cal. 1858).

9 Cal. 177 (Scannell v. Strahle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caulfield v. Bogle
2 Dakota 464 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1881)