Scannell v. Metterhausen

159 N.W. 1095, 134 Minn. 479, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 697
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedNovember 10, 1916
DocketNos. 20,009—(86)
StatusPublished

This text of 159 N.W. 1095 (Scannell v. Metterhausen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scannell v. Metterhausen, 159 N.W. 1095, 134 Minn. 479, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 697 (Mich. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the evidence supports the verdict. A reading of the record discloses such evidence, and we affirm the order appealed from without discussion thereof. No statutory costs will be allowed.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 N.W. 1095, 134 Minn. 479, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scannell-v-metterhausen-minn-1916.