Scanlon v. State

927 So. 2d 1021, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5970, 2006 WL 1083410
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 2006·No. No. 4D06-40·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of Kurt D. Scanlon’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 as untimely. The certificate of service on Scanlon’s motion shows that he delivered it to prison mail authorities within the two year limitations period of rule 3.850(b). His motion is presumed to be timely filed under the “mailbox rule.” See Fla. R.App. P. 9.420(a)(2); Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614, 617 (Fla.1992); Denton v. State, 912 So.2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Therefore we reverse and remand for further consideration of this motion for postconviction relief.

POLEN, FARMER, and KLEIN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scanlon v. State, 927 So. 2d 1021, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5970, 2006 WL 1083410 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

927 So. 2d 1021 (Scanlon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Denton v. State
912 So. 2d 612 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)