Scanlon v. Ohio

Sixth Circuit

Scanlon v. Ohio

148 F.2d 528, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2467

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 13, 1945·No. No. 9835·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal of George Scanlon from the denial by the District Court of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus has been duly considered upon the full record and the briefs, and upon the oral argument of counsel appointed by this court to represent Scanlon on this appeal;

And it appearing that the matters presented have been heretofore considered and have been adjudicated adversely to the contentions of appellant in the companion case of Tompsett v. State of Ohio and Henderson, Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary, 146 F.2d 95, decided December 14, 1944, certiorari denied April 2, 1945, 65 S.Ct. 916, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the authority of that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appeal of George Scanlon from the denial by the District Court of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus has been duly considered upon the full record and the briefs, and upon the oral argument of counsel appointed by this court to represent Scanlon on this appeal;

And it appearing that the matters presented have been heretofore considered and have been adjudicated adversely to the contentions of appellant in the companion case of Tompsett v. State of Ohio and Henderson, Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary, 146 F.2d 95, decided December 14, 1944, certiorari denied April 2, 1945, 65 S.Ct. 916, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the authority of that case.

Scanlon v. Ohio, 148 F.2d 528, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2467 (6th Cir. 1945).

Pincite

148 F.2d 528 (Scanlon v. Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related