Scanlon v. Curtis International, Ltd.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 25, 2021·No. 1:19-cv-00937·Unknown

Opinion

ROMAN SCANLON, on behalf of himself, No. 1:19-cv-00937-NONE-SKO the general public, and those similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND v. CLOSE THE CASE CURTIS INTERNATIONAL, LTD., (Doc. 94) Defendant. On February 24, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing Plaintiff Roman Scanlon’s individual claims with prejudice, and the putative class claims without prejudice. (Doc. 94.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, Plaintiff’s individual claims have been dismissed with prejudice, the putative class claims have been dismissed without prejudice, and this action has been terminated. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL assign a district judge to this matter and thereafter CLOSE the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 25, 2021 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scanlon v. Curtis International, Ltd., (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Scanlon v. Curtis International, Ltd. (Scanlon v. Curtis International, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)