Scanlan v. Ayres

Indiana Supreme Court

Scanlan v. Ayres

73 Ind. 211

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1880·No. No. 7424·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

"Woods, J.

— The error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial, which was asked solely on the ground, that the finding and judgment of the court were not sustained by sufficient evidence, and were contrary to law. The bill of exceptions, purporting to show the evidence, was not filed within the time granted by the court therefor, and is., therefore, not a part of the record.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

"Woods, J.

— The error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial, which was asked solely on the ground, that the finding and judgment of the court were not sustained by sufficient evidence, and were contrary to law. The bill of exceptions, purporting to show the evidence, was not filed within the time granted by the court therefor, and is., therefore, not a part of the record.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Scanlan v. Ayres, 73 Ind. 211 (Ind. 1880).

Pincite

73 Ind. 211 (Scanlan v. Ayres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related