Scanlan v. Ayers

Indiana Supreme Court

Scanlan v. Ayers

1 Ind. L. Rep. 327

DecidedMay 19, 1881

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ind. L. Rep. 327 (Scanlan v. Ayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scanlan v. Ayers, 1 Ind. L. Rep. 327 (Ind. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the court by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The error assigned ⅛ the overruling of the motion for a new trial which was asked solely on the ground that the finding and judgment of the court were not sustained by sufficient evidence and were contrary to law. The bill of exceptions purporting to show the evidence was not filed within the time granted by the court therefor, and is, therefore, not a part of the record.

Judgment affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the court by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The error assigned ⅛ the overruling of the motion for a new trial which was asked solely on the ground that the finding and judgment of the court were not sustained by sufficient evidence and were contrary to law. The bill of exceptions purporting to show the evidence was not filed within the time granted by the court therefor, and is, therefore, not a part of the record.

Judgment affirmed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ind. L. Rep. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scanlan-v-ayers-ind-1881.