Scampone v. Highland Park Care Center, LLC

15 A.3d 427

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scampone v. Highland Park Care Center, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 618 Pa. 363 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 8, 2011·No. 569, 570 WAL 2010·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in applying the corporate negligence theory, initially adopted by this Court in Thompson v. Nason Hospital, 527 Pa. 330, 591 A.2d 703 (1991), to a skilled nursing facility and the healthcare company responsible for its operations?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in applying the corporate negligence theory, initially adopted by this Court in Thompson v. Nason Hospital, 527 Pa. 330, 591 A.2d 703 (1991), to a skilled nursing facility and the healthcare company responsible for its operations?

Scampone v. Highland Park Care Center, LLC, 15 A.3d 427 (Pa. 2011).

Pincite

15 A.3d 427 (Scampone v. Highland Park Care Center, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Thompson v. Nason Hospital

591 A.2d 703 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)

Opinion

Related