Scampoli v. Scampoli

37 A.D.2d 614, 323 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3817
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 21, 1971
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 37 A.D.2d 614 (Scampoli v. Scampoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scampoli v. Scampoli, 37 A.D.2d 614, 323 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

In an action for separation, defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 4, 1971, as directed him to pay pendente lite child support of $75 a week and awarded exclusive occupancy of the marital premises to plaintiff. Order modified by deleting therefrom the following decretal provision: Plaintiff is awarded exclusive occupancy of the marital residence” and by substituting therefor the following: “Insofar as plaintiff’s motion seeks exclusive occupancy of the marital premises it is denied.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. While there is no question that a court is empowered to award exclusive possession of marital premises owned by the parties as tenants by the entirety to one of the parties pendente lite (Domestic Relations Law, § 234), unless there is a showing that such a directive is necessary to protect the safety of persons and property the court should not exercise its authority to apply it (Mayeri v. Mayeri, 26 Misc 2d 6). On the facts adduced at bar it was an improvident exercise of discretion to award plaintiff exclusive possession of the premises prior to a trial and without a hearing (Rowley v. Rowley, 6 A D 2d 1049). Munder, Acting P. J., Martuseello, Latham, Shapiro and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph v. Joseph
230 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Grogg v. Grogg
152 A.D.2d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Preston v. Preston
147 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Lidsky v. Lidsky
134 Misc. 2d 511 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
Delli Venneri v. Delli Venneri
120 A.D.2d 238 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Blumenfeld v. Blumenfeld
96 A.D.2d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Leibowits v. Leibowits
93 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Harkavy v. Harkavy
93 A.D.2d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Hite v. Hite
89 A.D.2d 577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Prince v. Prince
114 Misc. 2d 695 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Rauch v. Rauch
83 A.D.2d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Siegal v. Siegal
74 A.D.2d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Broadhurst v. Broadhurst
50 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 A.D.2d 614, 323 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scampoli-v-scampoli-nyappdiv-1971.