Scaminaci v. Jaffrey

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 19, 2024·No. 1:21-cv-00321·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: ANDRES SCAMINACI, DATE FILED: __ 4/19/2024 Plaintiff, 21-cv-321 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL OMAR JAFFREY, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter from the parties stating that they have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 157]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by May 20, 2024. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). All other dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. | i / lene Date: April 19, 2024 MARY KAY KOQGJL New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scaminaci v. Jaffrey, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Scaminaci v. Jaffrey (Scaminaci v. Jaffrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muze Inc. v. Digital on Demand, Inc.
356 F.3d 492 (Second Circuit, 2004)