Scaminaci v. Jaffrey
This text of Scaminaci v. Jaffrey (Scaminaci v. Jaffrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: ANDRES SCAMINACTI, DATE FILED: 1/22/2021 Plaintiff, 21-cv-321 (MKV) -against- SEALING ORDER OMAR JAFFREY, Defendant.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of letter motions from the parties and proposed intervenor seeking to redact certain filings to protect confidential business information [ECF #12, 15, 19, 30]. These requests are GRANTED. The public has a presumptive right of access to the filings in question. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006). However, courts in this circuit regularly permit redactions that are narrowly tailored to protect “sensitive and proprietary information.” Awestruck Mktg. Grp., LLC v. Black Ops Prods., LLC, 2016 WL 8814349, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. June 20, 2016). The Court has carefully reviewed all of the redactions and finds that they are narrowly tailored to protect confidential business information. Thus, the Court will maintain the unredacted versions of the documents under seal. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the letter motions pending at docket entries 12, 15, 19, and 30. SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: January 22, 2021 MARY Ai vert New York, NY United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scaminaci v. Jaffrey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scaminaci-v-jaffrey-nysd-2021.