Scaltro v. New York City Transit Authority
49 A.D.3d 709, 852 N.Y.2d 844
Opinion
The defendant New York City Transit Authority made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Trainer v City of New York, 41 AD3d 202 [2007]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Fisher, J.P., Miller, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scaltro v. New York City Transit Authority, 49 A.D.3d 709, 852 N.Y.2d 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
49 A.D.3d 709 (Scaltro v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Trainer v. City of New York
41 A.D.3d 202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)