Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Scaltro v. New York City Transit Authority

Scaltro v. New York City Transit Authority

49 A.D.3d 709, 852 N.Y.2d 844
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 18, 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.3d 709 (Scaltro v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scaltro v. New York City Transit Authority, 49 A.D.3d 709, 852 N.Y.2d 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

The defendant New York City Transit Authority made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Trainer v City of New York, 41 AD3d 202 [2007]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Fisher, J.P., Miller, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Trainer v. City of New York
41 A.D.3d 202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 709, 852 N.Y.2d 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scaltro-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2008.