Scallon v. Hooper

295 S.E.2d 480

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 21, 1982·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

295 S.E.2d 480 (1982)

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 21, 1982.

Moore, Ragsdale, Liggett, Ray & Foley, Raleigh, for defendants.

Bailey, Dixon, Wooten, McDonald & Fountain, Raleigh, for plaintiffs.

Defendants' petition for discretionary review, N.C.App., 293 S.E.2d 843, under G.S. § 7A-31 denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

295 S.E.2d 480 (1982)

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 21, 1982.

Moore, Ragsdale, Liggett, Ray & Foley, Raleigh, for defendants.

Bailey, Dixon, Wooten, McDonald & Fountain, Raleigh, for plaintiffs.

Defendants' petition for discretionary review, N.C.App., 293 S.E.2d 843, under G.S. § 7A-31 denied.

Scallon v. Hooper, 295 S.E.2d 480 (N.C. 1982).

Pincite

295 S.E.2d 480 (Scallon v. Hooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

817 F. Supp. 601 (E.D. North Carolina, 1993)