Scalise v. Sanford

Fifth Circuit

Scalise v. Sanford

170 F.2d 72

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 18, 1948

DocketNo. 12424

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 170 F.2d 72 (Scalise v. Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scalise v. Sanford, 170 F.2d 72 (5th Cir. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

His petition for habeas corpus having, after hearing been denied, appellant is here seeking a reversal of the judgment. A careful examination of the record shows that appellant was afforded a full and fair hearing in the court below, that no new or unsettled question requiring discussion is presented for our review, and that no error requiring reversal attended the proceedings below. The judgment is accordingly, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

His petition for habeas corpus having, after hearing been denied, appellant is here seeking a reversal of the judgment. A careful examination of the record shows that appellant was afforded a full and fair hearing in the court below, that no new or unsettled question requiring discussion is presented for our review, and that no error requiring reversal attended the proceedings below. The judgment is accordingly, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 F.2d 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scalise-v-sanford-ca5-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack