Scalise v. Sanford
170 F.2d 72
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 18, 1948·No. No. 12424·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
His petition for habeas corpus having, after hearing been denied, appellant is here seeking a reversal of the judgment. A careful examination of the record shows that appellant was afforded a full and fair hearing in the court below, that no new or unsettled question requiring discussion is presented for our review, and that no error requiring reversal attended the proceedings below. The judgment is accordingly, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scalise v. Sanford, 170 F.2d 72 (5th Cir. 1948).
170 F.2d 72 (Scalise v. Sanford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Scalise
86 F. Supp. 908 (E.D. New York, 1949)