Scalice v. Scalice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scalice v. Scalice

59 A.D.2d 718, 398 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13689

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 11, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 718 (Scalice v. Scalice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scalice v. Scalice, 59 A.D.2d 718, 398 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the petitioner wife appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 1, 1976, which, after a hearing, directed respondent to pay her $32.50 per week as support and a counsel fee of $250. Order modified, on the facts, by increasing the support payment to $40 per week and the counsel fee to $400. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the facts adduced at the hearing, we believe that the husband’s means warrant the increases herein made. Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Margett and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the petitioner wife appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 1, 1976, which, after a hearing, directed respondent to pay her $32.50 per week as support and a counsel fee of $250. Order modified, on the facts, by increasing the support payment to $40 per week and the counsel fee to $400. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the facts adduced at the hearing, we believe that the husband’s means warrant the increases herein made. Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Margett and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 718, 398 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scalice-v-scalice-nyappdiv-1977.