Scales v. USF Logistics
This text of Scales v. USF Logistics (Scales v. USF Logistics) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2511
ANTHONY L. SCALES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
USF LOGISTICS; JILL PINTOZZI; RANDY HLADKY; CHRIS JENNINGS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (CA-04-448)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 3, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony L. Scales, Appellant Pro Se. Mildred Bennett Wells, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Kristine Elizabeth Aubin, CONNELLY, SHEEHAN, HARRIS, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellees
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Anthony L. Scales appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing Scales’
Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Scales v. USF Logistics, No. CA-04-448
(E.D. Va. Dec. 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scales v. USF Logistics, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scales-v-usf-logistics-ca4-2005.