Scaife v. Hagens

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky

Scaife v. Hagens

21 F. Cas. 617, 19 O.G. 791

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky

DecidedFebruary 21, 1881

StatusPublished

This text of 21 F. Cas. 617 (Scaife v. Hagens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scaife v. Hagens, 21 F. Cas. 617, 19 O.G. 791 (circtdky 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

BAXTER, Circuit Judge.

This day this cause having been heard on evidence of the respective parties thereto, as contained in the printed records of said parties filed in the cause this day, and on the exhibits therein referred to, and on the arguments of James J. Johnston, James Speed, and Thomas Speed for complainants, and of James A. Beattie and Strawbridge & Taylor for defendants, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the reissued letters patent No. 4,4(57, dated July 11, 1871, to William B. Scaife, for improvement in boilers for ranges, stoves, &c., are invalid and void; and that the bill in equity in the above cause be, and is hereby, dismissed. And it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendants recover of the complainants their costs herein expended.

And thereupon complainants prayed an appeal to the supreme court of the United States, which was granted.

[The records of the office of the clerk of the supreme court do not show any entry of an appeal in this case.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BAXTER, Circuit Judge.

This day this cause having been heard on evidence of the respective parties thereto, as contained in the printed records of said parties filed in the cause this day, and on the exhibits therein referred to, and on the arguments of James J. Johnston, James Speed, and Thomas Speed for complainants, and of James A. Beattie and Strawbridge & Taylor for defendants, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the reissued letters patent No. 4,4(57, dated July 11, 1871, to William B. Scaife, for improvement in boilers for ranges, stoves, &c., are invalid and void; and that the bill in equity in the above cause be, and is hereby, dismissed. And it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendants recover of the complainants their costs herein expended.

And thereupon complainants prayed an appeal to the supreme court of the United States, which was granted.

[The records of the office of the clerk of the supreme court do not show any entry of an appeal in this case.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F. Cas. 617, 19 O.G. 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scaife-v-hagens-circtdky-1881.