Scahill v. Greece Central School District

New York Court of Appeals

Scahill v. Greece Central School District

811 N.E.2d 33, 2 N.Y. 754, 2 N.Y.3d 754, 778 N.Y.S.2d 771, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 635

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 6, 2004·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

In each case, the judgment of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed.

The District’s terminations of petitioners, two long-time employees, were based on their misconduct in selling at least 14,000 untaxed cigarettes on school property and using a school vehicle to store the cigarettes. This misconduct, which occurred over several months, involved the misappropriation of work time and a violation of the District’s trust and policy. Thus, the District did not abuse its discretion in terminating petitioners’ employment as the penalty does not shock judicial conscience (see Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39-40 [2001]; see also Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233 [1974]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur in memorandum.

In each case: On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

In each case, the judgment of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed.

The District’s terminations of petitioners, two long-time employees, were based on their misconduct in selling at least 14,000 untaxed cigarettes on school property and using a school vehicle to store the cigarettes. This misconduct, which occurred over several months, involved the misappropriation of work time and a violation of the District’s trust and policy. Thus, the District did not abuse its discretion in terminating petitioners’ employment as the penalty does not shock judicial conscience (see Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39-40 [2001]; see also Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233 [1974]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur in memorandum.

In each case: On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed, etc.

Scahill v. Greece Central School District, 811 N.E.2d 33, 2 N.Y. 754, 2 N.Y.3d 754, 778 N.Y.S.2d 771, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 635 (N.Y. 2004).

Pincite

811 N.E.2d 33 (Scahill v. Greece Central School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related