Scagnelli v. Mastrangelo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scagnelli v. Mastrangelo

265 A.D. 834, 37 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6031

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D. 834 (Scagnelli v. Mastrangelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scagnelli v. Mastrangelo, 265 A.D. 834, 37 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty and Close, JJ., concur; Carswell and Adel, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment with the following memorandum: The disputed questions of fact were submitted to the jury on a fair and impartial charge and in our opinion the finding of the jury may not be said to be against the weight of the evidence. (Mieuli v. New York & Queens County Railway Co., 136 App. Div. 373.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty and Close, JJ., concur; Carswell and Adel, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment with the following memorandum: The disputed questions of fact were submitted to the jury on a fair and impartial charge and in our opinion the finding of the jury may not be said to be against the weight of the evidence. (Mieuli v. New York & Queens County Railway Co., 136 App. Div. 373.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D. 834, 37 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scagnelli-v-mastrangelo-nyappdiv-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack