Scagnelli v. Mastrangelo
265 A.D. 834, 37 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6031
Opinion
Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty and Close, JJ., concur; Carswell and Adel, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment with the following memorandum: The disputed questions of fact were submitted to the jury on a fair and impartial charge and in our opinion the finding of the jury may not be said to be against the weight of the evidence. (Mieuli v. New York & Queens County Railway Co., 136 App. Div. 373.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scagnelli v. Mastrangelo, 265 A.D. 834, 37 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
265 A.D. 834 (Scagnelli v. Mastrangelo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mieuli v. New York & Queens County Railway Co.
136 A.D. 373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)