Scaglione v. Victory Memorial Hospital

205 A.D.2d 520, 613 N.Y.S.2d 213
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 6, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 520 (Scaglione v. Victory Memorial Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scaglione v. Victory Memorial Hospital, 205 A.D.2d 520, 613 N.Y.S.2d 213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), entered October 7, 1992, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A party who seeks an adverse inference charge against an opponent who fails to produce a document must make a prima facie showing that the document in question actually exists and that it is under the opposing party’s control (see, Fares v Fox, 198 AD2d 396; Eagle Pet Serv. Co. v Pacific Empl. Ins. [521]*521Co., 175 AD2d 471). The party requesting the charge must also show that the adverse party has no reasonable explanation for not producing the document (PJI 1:77). We find that, in light of the defendant’s reasonable excuse that they no longer had six-year-old maintenance records, the trial court properly denied the plaintiffs’ request for a missing document charge.

Further, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in refusing to allow the plaintiffs’ attorney to testify for the purpose of impeaching the credibility of the plaintiff Anna Lucia Scaglione’s hospital roommate, a nonparty witness, on a collateral matter (see, Halloran v Virginia Chems., 41 NY2d 386; Pipitone v Zweig, 186 AD2d 73).

We have considered the plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find that they are either without merit or unpreserved for appellate review. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Lawrence and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eastman v. Nash
2017 NY Slip Op 6523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Thomas v. Rogers Auto Collision, Inc.
69 A.D.3d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Jean-Pierre v. Touro College
40 A.D.3d 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Calabritto v. Dillon
309 A.D.2d 744 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Mathis v. New York Health Club, Inc.
288 A.D.2d 56 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Baez v. City of New York
278 A.D.2d 83 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Wilkie v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
274 A.D.2d 474 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Love v. New York City Housing Authority
251 A.D.2d 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Cidieufort v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
250 A.D.2d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Crespo v. New York City Housing Authority
222 A.D.2d 300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
George Larkin Trucking Co. v. Lisbon Tire Mart, Inc.
210 A.D.2d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 A.D.2d 520, 613 N.Y.S.2d 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scaglione-v-victory-memorial-hospital-nyappdiv-1994.