Scaglione v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Scaglione v. State

9 So. 2d 97, 151 Fla. 7, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1101

DecidedJune 30, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 9 So. 2d 97 (Scaglione v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scaglione v. State, 9 So. 2d 97, 151 Fla. 7, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1101 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

TERRELL, J.:

Appellant, was convicted for conducting a lottery contrary to the Laws of Florida. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the information, the failure of the Court to give charges with reference to the evidence of “spotters” and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

The sufficiency of the information is concluded by Collier v. State, 116 Fla. 703, 156 So. 703, the challenge as to the charges is concluded by Section 215 (4) Criminal Procedure Act and the challenge as to the suffiieency of the evidence is concluded by La Barbara v. State, opinion filed May 29, 1942, not yet reported.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI