Scaglione v. H.B.D. Contracting, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Scaglione v. H.B.D. Contracting, Inc.

398 S.W.3d 124, 2013 WL 1905276, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 561

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 2013·No. No. ED 97314·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

H.B.D. Contracting, Inc. (H.B.D.) appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Steve Scaglione and Scaglione Corporation (Scaglione) on its construction negligence and negligence per se claims. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

H.B.D. Contracting, Inc. (H.B.D.) appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Steve Scaglione and Scaglione Corporation (Scaglione) on its construction negligence and negligence per se claims. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Scaglione v. H.B.D. Contracting, Inc., 398 S.W.3d 124, 2013 WL 1905276, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 561 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

398 S.W.3d 124 (Scaglione v. H.B.D. Contracting, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.