Scaglione v. Best
This text of 196 So. 2d 22 (Scaglione v. Best) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellants, defendants below, have appealed from a judgment based on a jury verdict for the plaintiffs below, appellees here. There were three separate appeals which were consolidated.
Cases No. 7088 and No. 7091 were appeals from minute book entries without the signature of a judge, although the entry in one of the appeals purported to carry the signature of all the circuit judges of Hillsborough County. These signatures were located on the bottom of an order carrying over all unfinished items on the docket of the court to the next term.
Pursuant to Egantoff v. Herring, Fla. App.1965, 177 So.2d 260, State ex rel. Herring v. Allen, Fla.1966, 189 So.2d 363, we dismiss Case No. 7088 and Case No. 7091.
In Case No. 7092, the judgment was properly signed by a circuit judge and we direct this opinion to that case.
We have reviewed the evidence before-the lower court, as well as the assignments of error in the present case and do not find reversible error. We therefore affirm the lower court
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 So. 2d 22, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scaglione-v-best-fladistctapp-1967.