Scaggs v. McGinnis Brothers, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Scaggs v. McGinnis Brothers, Inc.

46 F. App'x 185

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 20, 2002·No. No. 02-1269·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Glenn R. Scaggs and Jamie Scaggs appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Scaggs v. McGinnis Bros., Inc., No. CA-99-819 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Glenn R. Scaggs and Jamie Scaggs appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Scaggs v. McGinnis Bros., Inc., No. CA-99-819 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Scaggs v. McGinnis Brothers, Inc., 46 F. App'x 185 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

46 F. App'x 185 (Scaggs v. McGinnis Brothers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related