Scaggs v. Barker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Scaggs v. Barker

1953 OK 27, 256 P.2d 428, 208 Okla. 358, 1953 Okla. LEXIS 796

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 3, 1953

DocketNo. 35664

StatusPublished

This text of 1953 OK 27 (Scaggs v. Barker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scaggs v. Barker, 1953 OK 27, 256 P.2d 428, 208 Okla. 358, 1953 Okla. LEXIS 796 (Okla. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

WELCH, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a supersedeas bond growing out of the case of DeBose v. Barker, 204 Okl. 607, 232 P.2d 925.

A motion to dismiss has been filed •for the reason that the appeal is without merit .and taken for delay only. The motion must be sustained. There was no meritorious defense presented in the trial court and no meritorious defense is suggested in the response to the motion to dismiss. In Debose v. Barker, Okl., 250 P.2d 852, we stated:

“Where, from a cursory examination of the record, the allegations made in the motion to dismiss and the response thereto it appears that the appeal is without merit, a motion to dismiss will be sustained.”

Appeal dismissed.

CORN, DAVISON, O’NEAL, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI