Scafidi v. Reichbach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scafidi v. Reichbach

65 A.D.3d 1155, 885 N.Y.S.2d 224

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.D.3d 1155 (Scafidi v. Reichbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scafidi v. Reichbach, 65 A.D.3d 1155, 885 N.Y.S.2d 224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Gustin L. Reichbach, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to decide the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPL article 440 in a criminal proceeding entitled People v Scafidi pending in that court under indictment Nos. 13366/90 and 7433/92. Application by the petitioner to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner’s motion was decided by order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 13, 2009. Accordingly, this proceeding is academic. Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Balkin and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Gustin L. Reichbach, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to decide the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPL article 440 in a criminal proceeding entitled People v Scafidi pending in that court under indictment Nos. 13366/90 and 7433/92. Application by the petitioner to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner’s motion was decided by order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 13, 2009. Accordingly, this proceeding is academic. Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Balkin and Austin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.3d 1155, 885 N.Y.S.2d 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scafidi-v-reichbach-nyappdiv-2009.