Scaduto v. Scaduto

Missouri Court of Appeals

Scaduto v. Scaduto

877 S.W.2d 217, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 892

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 1994·No. No. 64125·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a dissolution case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.App.1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a dissolution case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.App.1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Scaduto v. Scaduto, 877 S.W.2d 217, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 892 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

877 S.W.2d 217 (Scaduto v. Scaduto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related