Scaccuto v. State
6 Ohio Law. Abs. 239
This text of 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 239 (Scaccuto v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scaccuto v. State, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 239 (Ohio 1928).
Opinion
In a criminal prosecution, questions of fact are for the jury, and a judgment of guilty will not be reversed as not sustained by sufficient evidence unless the verdict and judgment are clearly and manifestly - contrary to the evidence, Breese v. The State, 12 Ohio St., 146, approved and followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Ohio Law. Abs. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scaccuto-v-state-ohio-1928.