SC v. TK

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 9, 2023
DocketCAAP-22-0000748
StatusPublished

This text of SC v. TK (SC v. TK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SC v. TK, (hawapp 2023).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 09-JUN-2023 08:10 AM Dkt. 22 ODSD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

SC and on behalf of minors, Petitioner-Appellant, v. TK, Respondent-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 3FDA-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief were due on or before March 3, 2023, and April 3, 2023, respectively; (2) Self-represented Petitioner-Appellant SC failed to file either document, or request an extension of time; (3) On May 1, 2023, the appellate clerk entered a default of the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief, notifying SC that the time for filing the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on May 11, 2023, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and SC could request relief from default by motion; and (4) The appellate clerk mailed the default notice to SC at her address on record. The United States Postal Service returned the default notice as undeliverable as addressed and unable to forward. SC has not filed a notice of change of NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

address, as required by HRAP Rule 25(f), and SC took no further action in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, June 9, 2023.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SC v. TK, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sc-v-tk-hawapp-2023.