S.B.S. Associates v. Weissman-Heller, Inc.
This text of 190 A.D.2d 529 (S.B.S. Associates v. Weissman-Heller, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered June 2, 1992, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and declared that defendant is not obligated to make rent escalation payments pursuant to the terms of the lease between plaintiff as landlord and defendant as tenant unless plaintiff actually makes rent escalation payments to the owner of the building, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The IAS Court correctly determined that our decision in Fairfax Co. v Whelan Drug Co. (105 AD2d 647), established that a tax escalator clause is designed to afford relief to a landlord where an increased assessment required actual payment. To hold otherwise would allow the plaintiff-landlord to [530]*530reap a windfall not envisioned by the parties’ agreement. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 A.D.2d 529, 593 N.Y.S.2d 28, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sbs-associates-v-weissman-heller-inc-nyappdiv-1993.