SBCW Consulting Inc v. TSYS Merchant Solutions LLC
This text of SBCW Consulting Inc v. TSYS Merchant Solutions LLC (SBCW Consulting Inc v. TSYS Merchant Solutions LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SBCW CONSULTING INC., Case No. 2:24-cv-03193-SB-AGR
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT-MATTER TSYS MERCHANT SOLUTIONS JURISDICTION LLC et al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff SBCW Consulting Inc. filed this putative class action alleging overcharging of credit card processing fees on April 18, 2024, asserting federal subject-matter jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 23.
Federal courts have subject-matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the U.S. Constitution and Congress. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). This Court has a duty to assess whether federal subject- matter jurisdiction exists and may consider the issue sua sponte at any stage of the proceedings. See Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574, 583 (1999) (recognizing that “Article III generally requires a federal court to satisfy itself of its jurisdiction over the subject matter before it considers the merits of a case”).
A federal district court has original jurisdiction under CAFA when (1) there are 100 or more members of the putative class, (2) the amount in controversy exceeds $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and (3) minimal diversity is established. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2); see also Broadway Grill, Inc. v. Visa Inc., 856 F.3d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 2017) (“Under CAFA there is sufficient diversity to establish federal diversity jurisdiction so long as one class member has citizenship diverse from that of one defendant.”). The complaint does not provide a basis for its assertion that the amount in controversy exceeds $5,000,000. Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 23. Thus, the Court lacks sufficient information to determine the amount in controversy. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, by no later than May 3, 2024, why the Court should not dismiss this case without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Date: April 23, 2024 ___________________________ Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SBCW Consulting Inc v. TSYS Merchant Solutions LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sbcw-consulting-inc-v-tsys-merchant-solutions-llc-cacd-2024.