Sbarbero v. Miller

77 A. 1088, 74 N.J. Eq. 453, 4 Buchanan 453, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 293
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 15, 1908·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Affirmed June 15th, 1908.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgii, Green, Gray, Dill — 15. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sbarbero v. Miller, 77 A. 1088, 74 N.J. Eq. 453, 4 Buchanan 453, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 293 (N.J. 1908).

77 A. 1088 (Sbarbero v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Biddle v. Biddle
398 A.2d 1297 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Continental Can Co. v. Hudson Foam
303 A.2d 97 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)
Ratsch v. Holderman
158 A.2d 24 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)
LL Constantin & Co. v. RP Holding Corp.
153 A.2d 378 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
MECHANICAL DEVICES CO., INC. v. General Builders, Inc.
99 A.2d 605 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Littlefield v. Kearns
68 A.2d 419 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
East Paterson v. Karkus
41 A.2d 332 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
In Re Lanterman
162 A. 123 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1932)