Sbano v. Sbano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sbano v. Sbano

33 A.D.2d 1007

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 1007 (Sbano v. Sbano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sbano v. Sbano, 33 A.D.2d 1007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered July 2, 1969, unanimously modified on the law and the facts by reducing temporary support and maintenance for plaintiff and child, issue of the marriage, to the sum of $125 per week commencing May 9, 1969, and striking provision granting plaintiff leave to apply to the trial court for additional counsel fees and otherwise affirmed without costs and without disbursements. The record does not justify a temporary award in excess of $125 per week. Having “ regard to the circumstances * * of the respective parties ” (Domestic Relations Law, § 237) in this simple separation action, we deem the sum of $1,000 awarded as adequate for counsel fees. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered July 2, 1969, unanimously modified on the law and the facts by reducing temporary support and maintenance for plaintiff and child, issue of the marriage, to the sum of $125 per week commencing May 9, 1969, and striking provision granting plaintiff leave to apply to the trial court for additional counsel fees and otherwise affirmed without costs and without disbursements. The record does not justify a temporary award in excess of $125 per week. Having “ regard to the circumstances * * of the respective parties ” (Domestic Relations Law, § 237) in this simple separation action, we deem the sum of $1,000 awarded as adequate for counsel fees. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sbano-v-sbano-nyappdiv-1970.