S.B. v. State

940 So. 2d 576, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18342
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in S.B. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11591
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 27, 2006·No. No. 5D06-3694·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus as the trial court summarily adjudicated and sentenced Petitioner for direct contempt without providing Petitioner an opportunity to be heard on the matter, nor present any “evidence of excusing or mitigating circumstances.”1 Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.150(a); M.L. v. State, 819 So.2d 240 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). The trial court shall, within three business days of the date of this opinion, either conduct a hearing in accordance with rule 8.150(a), or order Petitioner’s immediate release from secure detention.

PETITION GRANTED; CAUSE REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, MONACO and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S.B. v. State, 940 So. 2d 576, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18342 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

940 So. 2d 576 (S.B. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M.L. v. State
819 So. 2d 240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)