SB Ice Steak, LLC, etc. v. The Sterling Building, Inc., a Florida corporation

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 14, 2024
Docket2023-1848
StatusPublished

This text of SB Ice Steak, LLC, etc. v. The Sterling Building, Inc., a Florida corporation (SB Ice Steak, LLC, etc. v. The Sterling Building, Inc., a Florida corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SB Ice Steak, LLC, etc. v. The Sterling Building, Inc., a Florida corporation, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed August 14, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-1848 Lower Tribunal No. 2020-26233-CA-01 ________________

SB Ice Steak, LLC, etc., Appellant,

vs.

The Sterling Building, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Lopez, Judge.

Saul Ewing LLP and Hilda Piloto, for appellant.

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Mark F. Raymond and Shane P. Martin, for appellee.

Before MILLER, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Okeechobee Resorts, L.L.C. v. E Z Cash Pawn, Inc.,

145 So. 3d 989, 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“[W]hen a contract plainly provides

that any modification must be in writing, all claims—however labeled—

founded upon an alleged oral modification should generally be disposed of

as a matter of law.”); Bradley v. Sanchez, 943 So. 2d 218, 222 (Fla. 3d DCA

2006) (“Where the terms of the contract are clear and unambiguous,

summary judgment is appropriate . . . the record establishes that the parties

agreed not to allow a waiver of any contractual term without putting it in

writing . . . the contract clearly states that ‘modifications of this Contract will

not be binding unless in writing, signed and delivered by the party to be

bound.’ Thus, this language prevents an oral waiver or modification . . . .);

DTRS Intercontinental Miami, LLC v. A.K. Gift Shop, Inc., 77 So. 3d 785,

786-87 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“Section 83.232(5), Florida Statutes . . .

provides, ‘Failure of the tenant to pay the rent into the court registry pursuant

to court order shall be deemed an absolute waiver of the tenant's defenses’

. . . ‘The law is the law. It is not our job to carve exceptions into an otherwise

clear and imperative statute.’”) (citations omitted).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradley v. Sanchez
943 So. 2d 218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Okeechobee Resorts, L.L.C. v. E Z Cash Pawn, Inc.
145 So. 3d 989 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
DTRS Intercontinental Miami, LLC v. A.K. Gift Shop, Inc.
77 So. 3d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SB Ice Steak, LLC, etc. v. The Sterling Building, Inc., a Florida corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sb-ice-steak-llc-etc-v-the-sterling-building-inc-a-florida-fladistctapp-2024.