Sazenski v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Sazenski v. Commissioner of Public Safety

368 N.W.2d 408, 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4242

CourtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota

DecidedJune 4, 1985

DocketC4-84-2228

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 368 N.W.2d 408 (Sazenski v. Commissioner of Public Safety) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sazenski v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 368 N.W.2d 408, 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4242 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

FACTS

On September 22, 1984 at about 2:20 a.m., Eagan Police Officer Gerald Meszaros was standing near his parked squad car along Highway 55 in Eagan, Minnesota. His attention was drawn by the sound of an approaching vehicle which appeared to be speeding. Meszaros observed a Corvette drive past and he estimated it was traveling between 70 and 80 miles per hour in the posted speed limit zone of 50 miles per hour. Meszaros testified that he had received formal training in the estimation of traffic speed. Meszaros pursued the vehicle for about two to two and one-half miles and stopped the car. Appellant Dennis Sazenski identified himself as the driver and was later arrested for D.W.I. in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (1984). The trial court sustained the revocation of Sazenski’s driver’s license, finding that the officer had sufficient cause to stop Sazenski.

DECISION

“The test for determining the legality of a stop of a motor vehicle is whether the police had a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the driver or passengers) of criminal activity.” State v. L’Italien, 355 N.W.2d 709, 710 (Minn.1984) (citing United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 101 S.Ct. 690, 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981)). Here, the record amply supports the trial court’s determination that the stop was proper.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

FACTS

On September 22, 1984 at about 2:20 a.m., Eagan Police Officer Gerald Meszaros was standing near his parked squad car along Highway 55 in Eagan, Minnesota. His attention was drawn by the sound of an approaching vehicle which appeared to be speeding. Meszaros observed a Corvette drive past and he estimated it was traveling between 70 and 80 miles per hour in the posted speed limit zone of 50 miles per hour. Meszaros testified that he had received formal training in the estimation of traffic speed. Meszaros pursued the vehicle for about two to two and one-half miles and stopped the car. Appellant Dennis Sazenski identified himself as the driver and was later arrested for D.W.I. in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (1984). The trial court sustained the revocation of Sazenski’s driver’s license, finding that the officer had sufficient cause to stop Sazenski.

DECISION

“The test for determining the legality of a stop of a motor vehicle is whether the police had a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the driver or passengers) of criminal activity.” State v. L’Italien, 355 N.W.2d 709, 710 (Minn.1984) (citing United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 101 S.Ct. 690, 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981)). Here, the record amply supports the trial court’s determination that the stop was proper.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

368 N.W.2d 408, 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sazenski-v-commissioner-of-public-safety-minnctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack