Saz v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
This text of 22 F. App'x 925 (Saz v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Alireza Saz appeals the summary judgment in favor of defendant in Saz’s action for breach of contract. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the summary judgment, Ray v. Henderson, 217 F.3d 1234, 1239 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.
The district court properly granted Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Northwestern”) summary judgment because Saz failed to controvert Northwestern’s evidence that Saz fraudulently withheld material information from his insurance application. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Agric. Ins. Co. v. Superior Court, 70 Cal.App.4th 385, 82 Cal.Rptr.2d 594, 603 (Cal.Ct.App. 1999) (stating elements of fraud under California law).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F. App'x 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saz-v-northwestern-mutual-life-insurance-ca9-2002.