Sayres v. Gregory
This text of 7 Ind. 633 (Sayres v. Gregory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for a highway lying in a single township, pending before the board of county commissioners when the code of 1852, changing the law, came into force. B. F. Gregory appeared, on that code coming into force, and moved the commissioners to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The motion was sustained. This was wrong. . The proceeding was saved by the statute in reference to pending suits.
On appeal to the Common Pleas, the motion was renewed and wrongfully sustained. It was there also ob[634]*634jected that the cause was not properly docketed as to parties defendant. We see nothing in this objection. If the proper parties had not been named by the clerk in docketing the cause, as to which we do not decide, the papers furnished the necessary data to correct the entry. In the absence of correction, those named, for aught that appears, must abide.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Ind. 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sayres-v-gregory-ind-1856.