Sayre v. Bank of Mobile
This text of 9 Port. 423 (Sayre v. Bank of Mobile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a motion in the court below, against the plaintiffs in error, as the endorsers of a bill of exchange, upon which the Bank obtained judgment.
The judgment of the court below, does not disclose that the bill was negotiable and payable at the Bank of Mobile, or that, if payable at any of the other Banks in Mobile, the Bank acquired property in the bill subsequent to the thirtieth of June, eighteen hundred and thirty-seven. These facts sufficiently appear in the notice, but that is not made a part of tlje record. The judgment [424]*424must therefore be reversed, on the authority of the case of Joseph Bates, jr. vs. The Planters’ & Merchants’ Bank, (8 Porter, 99,) and Henry S. Levert vs. The Planters’ & Merchants’ Bank, (8 Porter, 104,) and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Port. 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sayre-v-bank-of-mobile-ala-1839.