Saylor v. State

188 S.E. 514, 183 Ga. 440, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 597
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 27, 1936
DocketNo. 11368
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 188 S.E. 514 (Saylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saylor v. State, 188 S.E. 514, 183 Ga. 440, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 597 (Ga. 1936).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Under tlie facts of this case the judge abused his discretion in refusing to allow the attorneys for the accused additional time to prepare the case for trial. Because of this error a new trial should be granted.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., and Bell, J., who dissent. Herschel Parham and J. R. Whitaker, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, John G. Mitchell, solicitor-general, B. D. Murphy, and E. J. Glower, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chadwick v. State
146 S.E.2d 283 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Griffin v. State
69 S.E.2d 192 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
McLendon v. State
52 S.E.2d 294 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 S.E. 514, 183 Ga. 440, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saylor-v-state-ga-1936.