Saylor v. State

188 S.E. 514, 183 Ga. 440, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 597
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 27, 1936·No. No. 11368·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Under tlie facts of this case the judge abused his discretion in refusing to allow the attorneys for the accused additional time to prepare the case for trial. Because of this error a new trial should be granted.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., and Bell, J., who dissent. Herschel Parham and J. R. Whitaker, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, John G. Mitchell, solicitor-general, B. D. Murphy, and E. J. Glower, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saylor v. State, 188 S.E. 514, 183 Ga. 440, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 597 (Ga. 1936).

188 S.E. 514 (Saylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chadwick v. State
146 S.E.2d 283 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Griffin v. State
69 S.E.2d 192 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
McLendon v. State
52 S.E.2d 294 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)