Saylor v. . Powell

90 N.C. 202
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1884·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Ashe, J.

The only question presented for the determination of this court is, whether the defendants, or either of them, are entitled to a homestead in the house and lot.

The claim set up by the widow for a homestead is decided in the case of Wharton v. Leggett, 80 N. C., 169, where it is held that, under article ten, section live of the constitution, a widow is not entitled to a homestead in the lands of her husband, if he die leaving children — minors or adults.

And the defendant B. F. Powell is not entitled to a homestead, either under the constitution or under the act of 1877, ch. 253. It is alleged in the complaint that he was twenty-one years old, which is not denied. So that even if he was a minor when his father died, and he was then entitled to a homestead, the right ceased as soon as ho attained his majority. Const., Art. X, §3. Nor is he entitled to it by virtue of the act of 1877, for that act has been declared to be in violation of the constitution of the state. Wharton v. Taylor, 88 N. C., 230.

There is no error. Let this be certified, that the case may be proceeded with in accordance with this opinion and the law.

No error. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saylor v. . Powell, 90 N.C. 202 (N.C. 1884).

90 N.C. 202 (Saylor v. . Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnes v. . Cherry
130 S.E. 611 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Simmons v. . Respass
65 S.E. 516 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)