Sayles v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois

Sayles v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co.

21 F. Cas. 605

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois

DecidedJuly 1, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 21 F. Cas. 605 (Sayles v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sayles v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co., 21 F. Cas. 605 (circtndil 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

[DRUMMOND, Circuit Judge,

held that the court had jurisdiction of a bill filed against the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, and based on an infringement of a patent committed by that corporation in Michigan; service having been made on an agent of the corporation at its office in the Northern district of Illinois, although neither that agent nor the business transacted in that office had any connection with the infringement.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[DRUMMOND, Circuit Judge,

held that the court had jurisdiction of a bill filed against the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, and based on an infringement of a patent committed by that corporation in Michigan; service having been made on an agent of the corporation at its office in the Northern district of Illinois, although neither that agent nor the business transacted in that office had any connection with the infringement.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F. Cas. 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sayles-v-grand-trunk-ry-co-circtndil-1879.