Sayles v. Continental Casualty Co.
497 F. App'x 682
This text of 497 F. App'x 682 (Sayles v. Continental Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sayles v. Continental Casualty Co., 497 F. App'x 682 (8th Cir. 2013).
Opinion
Cathy Sayles appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. Upon de novo review, see Chorosevic v. MetLife Choices, 600 F.3d 934, 941 (8th Cir.2010), we find no basis for reversal. The district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chorosevic v. MetLife Choices
600 F.3d 934 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
497 F. App'x 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sayles-v-continental-casualty-co-ca8-2013.