Sayles v. Continental Casualty Co.

Eighth Circuit

Sayles v. Continental Casualty Co.

497 F. App'x 682

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 31, 2013·No. No. 12-1920·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cathy Sayles appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in her action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. Upon de novo review, see Chorosevic v. MetLife Choices, 600 F.3d 934, 941 (8th Cir.2010), we find no basis for reversal. The district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Cathy Sayles appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in her action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. Upon de novo review, see Chorosevic v. MetLife Choices, 600 F.3d 934, 941 (8th Cir.2010), we find no basis for reversal. The district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Sayles v. Continental Casualty Co., 497 F. App'x 682 (8th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

497 F. App'x 682 (Sayles v. Continental Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related