Sayler v. Yan Sun

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sayler v. Yan Sun. Read the opinion of the Court — 413 Mont. 303
Montana Supreme Court·Decided April 6, 2022·No. DA 22-0133·Unpublished

Opinion

04/06/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0133

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0133

MEGAN SAYLER,

Petitioner and Appellee,

v. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

YAN SUN,

Respondent and Appellant.

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT Addison Sessions, whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this April 6, 2022.

6H Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Melinda Ann Driscoll, Morgan E. Dake, Penelope S. Strong, Addison Sessions

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sayler v. Yan Sun, (Mo. 2022).

Sayler v. Yan Sun (Sayler v. Yan Sun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.