Sayers v. Walker
61 A. 973, 21 Del. 400, 5 Penne. 400, 1905 Del. LEXIS 33
Opinion
[401]*401Affidavit of demand containing the following cause of action, was filed, as book entries:
“Harry D. Walker, Dr., to John Sayers.
“ August 28, 1905.
“Commission on sale of property N. E. Corner Sixth and Madison Streets, Wilmington, Del., to James Toner, consideration, $18,200 at 2 per cent., $364.00.”
Application that judgment be refused on the affidavit of demand because the copy disclosed a claim which was not properly a book entry or account under our statute.
Sloan vs. Grimshaw, 4 Houst., 326; Taylor vs. Addicks, 4 Pennewill, 411.
Judgment refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sayers v. Walker, 61 A. 973, 21 Del. 400, 5 Penne. 400, 1905 Del. LEXIS 33 (Del. Ct. App. 1905).
61 A. 973 (Sayers v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edsall v. Rockland Paper Co.
194 A. 115 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1937)
Lewes Hotel Co. v. Hill
162 A. 360 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1932)