Sayers v. Walker
61 A. 973, 21 Del. 400, 5 Penne. 400, 1905 Del. LEXIS 33
This text of 61 A. 973 (Sayers v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sayers v. Walker, 61 A. 973, 21 Del. 400, 5 Penne. 400, 1905 Del. LEXIS 33 (Del. Ct. App. 1905).
Opinion
[401]*401Affidavit of demand containing the following cause of action, was filed, as book entries:
“Harry D. Walker, Dr., to John Sayers.
“ August 28, 1905.
“Commission on sale of property N. E. Corner Sixth and Madison Streets, Wilmington, Del., to James Toner, consideration, $18,200 at 2 per cent., $364.00.”
Application that judgment be refused on the affidavit of demand because the copy disclosed a claim which was not properly a book entry or account under our statute.
Sloan vs. Grimshaw, 4 Houst., 326; Taylor vs. Addicks, 4 Pennewill, 411.
Judgment refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Edsall v. Rockland Paper Co.
194 A. 115 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1937)
Lewes Hotel Co. v. Hill
162 A. 360 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
61 A. 973, 21 Del. 400, 5 Penne. 400, 1905 Del. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sayers-v-walker-delsuperct-1905.