Sayers v. Kent
50 A. 296, 201 Pa. 38, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 711
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 8, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 95·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
- The learned judge of the court below justly held that the payment made by the defendant was a valid and legal payment sufficient in law and equity to prevent a forfeiture of the rights acquired by the defendant in said lease.
The decree is therefore affirmed upon his opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sayers v. Kent, 50 A. 296, 201 Pa. 38, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 711 (Pa. 1901).
50 A. 296 (Sayers v. Kent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Romaine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
901 A.2d 477 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Mitchell v. Probst
1915 OK 828 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)