Sayers v. Kent
50 A. 296, 201 Pa. 38, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 711
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 8, 1901
DocketAppeal, No. 95
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 50 A. 296 (Sayers v. Kent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sayers v. Kent, 50 A. 296, 201 Pa. 38, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 711 (Pa. 1901).
Opinion
- The learned judge of the court below justly held that the payment made by the defendant was a valid and legal payment sufficient in law and equity to prevent a forfeiture of the rights acquired by the defendant in said lease.
The decree is therefore affirmed upon his opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Romaine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
901 A.2d 477 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Mitchell v. Probst
1915 OK 828 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
50 A. 296, 201 Pa. 38, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sayers-v-kent-pa-1901.