Sayed v. Ibrihim

D.C. Circuit

Sayed v. Ibrihim

85 F. App'x 776

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 14, 2004

DocketNo. 03-7106

StatusPublished

This text of 85 F. App'x 776 (Sayed v. Ibrihim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sayed v. Ibrihim, 85 F. App'x 776 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 7, 2003 be affirmed. In the judgment filed June 11, 2003, the district court properly dismissed the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration of that order.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 7, 2003 be affirmed. In the judgment filed June 11, 2003, the district court properly dismissed the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration of that order.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 F. App'x 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sayed-v-ibrihim-cadc-2004.