Saye v. State
145 S.W. 1189, 66 Tex. Crim. 257, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 222
Opinion
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted for unlawfully taking and carrying away from the farm of another, naming who it was, melons and fined $5.
He did not enter into any recognizance! during the term of court, but six days after the court adjourned he entered into a bond giving sureties which was approved by the clerk and not by the court. Such proceeding does not give this court jurisdiction of the appeal. Terry v. State, recently decided wherein the authorities are cited.
The appeal will be dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saye v. State, 145 S.W. 1189, 66 Tex. Crim. 257, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 222 (Tex. 1912).
145 S.W. 1189 (Saye v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Welch v. State
199 S.W. 485 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)