Sayan v. State

606 So. 2d 1237, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10992
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 21, 1992·No. No. 92-0613·Published

Opinions

FARMER, Judge.

In a case involving two previous hung juries, see Sayan v. State, 381 So.2d 363 [1238]*1238(Fla. 4th DCA 1980), and where the third trial resulted in a verdict only because an Allen charge was given, we cannot possibly say about any evidence that categorically it clearly would not have produced a different result. We reverse the trial court’s summary denial of rule 3.850 relief, in his motion for which this prisoner cites newly discovered evidence and ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and remand for a full evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion. LETTS, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sayan v. State, 606 So. 2d 1237, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10992 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

606 So. 2d 1237 (Sayan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mollica v. State
374 So. 2d 1022 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Jones v. State
591 So. 2d 911 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Sayan v. State
381 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)