Say v. Adult & Family Services Division
This text of 671 P.2d 702 (Say v. Adult & Family Services Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This matter is before the court on petitioner’s motion to reinstate her appeal, which was dismissed as untimely.
The order appealed from was mailed on April 19, 1983. The petition for judicial review was filed more than 60 days later, on June 21, 1983. ORS 183.482(1). Therefore, unless the petition was mailed by registered or certified mail within 60 days of the date of mailing of the order appealed from, in accordance with ORS 19.028, it was filed late.
Although counsel for petitioner now asserts that the petition was mailed on June 17, 1983, and submits the affidavit of a postal clerk that mail addressed to the “Clerk of the Court of Appeals” was certified by her for petitioner’s counsel on June 17, 1983, the affidavit does not say that the mail was accepted or deposited for mailing on that date,1 and counsel’s certificate attached to the petition for judicial review states that it was deposited in the post office on June 18,1983. Also, the envelope in which the petition arrived was addressed to and received by the “State Court Administrator” and bore a cancellation dated June 20, 1983, p.m. On this record, petitioner has not established that the petition has been timely filed under ORS 19.028.
The motion to reinstate the appeal is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 P.2d 702, 65 Or. App. 546, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 4058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/say-v-adult-family-services-division-orctapp-1983.